CASE DISCUSSION: BARON AND OTHERS V CLAYTILE (PTY) LIMITED AND ANOTHER

In July, the Constitutional Court (the Court) ruled on whether it is just and equitable to evict persons from private land in terms of the Extension of Security of Tenure Act (ESTA), notwithstanding the absence of alternative accommodation. The Court found that private citizens have no obligation to relocate unlawful occupiers from their land as that responsibility lies with the government.
The applicants are former employees of a brick manufacturer located on a farm. They were permitted to live on the farm in units provided by the company for the duration of their employment. Upon the termination of said employment, they were given written eviction notices but they did not vacate the premises. Instead, they proceeded to occupy the units with their families for a further three years although they were now employed elsewhere.







