View Archived Content

CORRUPTION WATCH V SPEAKER OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY AND OTHERS

The Constitutional Court’s judgment in Corruption Watch v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others confirms that meaningful public participation is a constitutional requirement in the appointment of Chapter Nine institution commissioners. The Court found that Parliament’s failure to provide adequate information, sufficient time and accessible avenues for public comment rendered the Commission for Gender Equality appointment process unconstitutional.

Read More »

WHY SAHRC V MALEMA MATTERS

Freedom of expression is a cornerstone of South Africa’s democracy, but it is not unlimited. The SAHRC v Malema case highlights where the law draws the line between protected political speech and hate speech, offering important lessons for politicians, voters and constitutional democracy.

Read More »

CUSTOMARY MARRIAGES, PROPERTY RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL EQUALITY: WHY VVC V JRM MATTERS TO SOUTH AFRICANS

VVC v JRM clarifies how South African law treats couples who first marry under customary law and later conclude a civil marriage. The Court held this is one continuous marriage, not a new one. Rights and obligations from the customary marriage continue and property accumulated remains protected. Spouses cannot informally change proprietary rights; any change to the matrimonial property system requires court approval under section 21 of the Matrimonial Property Act. Interpreting section 10(2) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act with the MPA, the judgment advances equality, dignity, the protection of property rights and legal certainty, protecting vulnerable spouses and creditors.

Read More »

CASE NOTE: MKP v JSC

Daniela Ellerbeck reviews the latest saga surrounding Dr Hlophe and the JSC, looks at the facts and issues at hand to explain why the Court reached the conclusion it did.

Read More »