View Archived Content

STATEMENT: STOP PAYING BRIBES

anti corruptionCorruption has many guises. It includes bribing of public officials, public officials trading in influence or abusing their functions of power for personal gain, illicit enrichment and embezzlement, misappropriation or diversion of property by a public official. Of course, corruption is not limited to public administration. Nevertheless, corruption in public administration is particularly damaging to democratic institutions, the economy and the Rule of Law.

Read More »

SUMMARY: THE FUTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN SOUTH AFRICA

151203BreakfastOn 3 December 2015 the Centre for Constitutional Rights (CFCR) and the School of Public Leadership (SPL) at Stellenbosch University (SU), supported by the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung (KAS), hosted the fifth and final in a series of breakfast discussions for 2015. The aim of these discussions is to create a platform for conversation and debate about the Constitution and good public leadership. This discussion focused on the future of higher education in the country in the wake of two nationwide protests championed by students regarding transformation at these institutions, as well the raising of tuition fees at the same. The breakfast was attended by guests from across the spectrum including government, academia, civil society and the media.

Read More »

ARTICLE: INTERNATIONAL DAY OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES: CREATING ACCESS – HOW DO WE FARE?

IDPD3 December annually is set aside by the United Nations as the International Day of Persons with Disabilities. The day is meant to promote awareness and mobilise support for critical issues relating to the inclusion of persons with disabilities in society and development. The day seeks to further promote action to raise awareness about disability issues and draw attention to the benefits of an inclusive and accessible society for all. This years’ theme ‘Inclusion Matters: Access and Empowerment for People of all Abilities’ focuses on accessibility and disability in the context of urban development.

Read More »

CASE DISCUSSION: FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND THE RULE OF LAW: MTYHOPO V SOUTH AFRICAN MUNICIPAL WORKERS UNION NATIONAL PROVIDENT FUND

gavel smallThe recent ruling of the Constitutional Court in the Mtyhopo v South African Municipal Workers Union National Provident Fund, to set aside the decision of the Grahamstown High Court is welcomed. The decision emphasises the constitutionally-protected right to the freedom of expression. This right is enshrined in section 16 of the Constitution. The case concerns disgruntled members of the Municipal Workers Union National Provident Fund (the Fund) in the Eastern Cape and the manner in which the Fund attempted to infringe the right of the applicant to voice his grievances in relation to the Fund.

Read More »

CASE DISCUSSION: THE RIGHT TO EMERGENCY HEALTHCARE – OPPELT V HEAD: HEALTH, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, PROVINCIAL ADMINISTRATION: WESTERN CAPE

courtA recent ruling of the Constitutional Court (the Court) in the Oppelt v Head: Health, Department of Health, Provincial Administration: Western Cape saw a decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) set aside. The Court found that the Department of Health (the Department) was indeed liable to pay damages to Mr Oppelt (the Applicant) after a sporting accident which resulted in the Applicant being left quadriplegic. 

The case concerns a delictual claim which arose as a result of delayed medical treatment after the Applicant sustained an injury to his spinal cord during a rugby match that left him paralysed.

Read More »

CASE DISCUSSION: ALWAYS THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD: DE VILLIERS V S

girl plantThe recent judgment by the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in De Villiers v S to set aside the decision of the High Court and reduce the sentence of Mrs De Villiers is a victory for children’s rights and echoes precedent that dictates that where a child will be affected by the incarceration of a parent/ caregiver, heavy consideration must be afforded to the best interests of that child. Considering the importance of children’s rights, it is necessary to reflect on the thinking of the Court in handing down this decision.

In this case, Mrs De Villiers, a mother of two minor children, had been tried and convicted of 31 counts of fraud. Her husband and father of the children, has an addiction, thus the childcare responsibilities were largely borne by Mrs De Villiers.

Read More »

CASE DISCUSSION: WHEN GOVERNANCE AND ETHICS FAIL: SOUTH AFRICAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION AND OTHERS V THE DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE AND OTHERS

sca bloemfonteinThe recent ruling of the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) and Others v The Democratic Alliance and Others, which upheld the decision of the Western Cape High Court and dismissed the SABC’s appeal on behalf of its Chief Operating Officer (COO) Hlaudi Motsoeneng and the Minister of Communications, is a welcome one. This is because it serves to cement the authority of the office of the Public Protector, as well as those of other Chapter 9 institutions.

 

The matter commenced in the Western Cape High Court as a result of the publicised irregular appointment of the COO into his current position and the ensuing investigation into the same, as well as maladministration of the national broadcaster by the Minister of Communications.

Read More »

CASE DISCUSSION: DEMOCRATISING DECISION-MAKING IN TRADITIONAL SPACES: BAKGATLA-BA-KGAFELA COMMUNAL PROPERTY ASSOCIATION V BAKGTLA-BA-KGAFELA TRIBAL AUTHORITY AND OTHERS

farmThe Constitutional Court (the Court) recently handed down judgment in a matter concerning the interpretation of the Communal Property Association Act (the Act), the key piece of legislation governing the manner in which communities may hold land restored in terms of the land restitution process. This is the first decision concerning the implementation of the Act. Importantly, the decision underscores the supremacy of the Constitution by requiring that any traditional laws or practices have to be in harmony with the Constitution.

Read More »

CASE DISCUSSION: A MISSED OPPORTUNITY? PEASE AND OTHERS V THE GOVERNMENT OF SOUTH AFRICA AND OTHERS

Foter school kidsThe facts are well known – with South Africa’s education system under the spotlight and faring badly; textbook shortages, as well as school infrastructure backlogs. To compound matters, in 2012, the Department of Basic Education’s Annual National Assessments revealed that grade nine students on average scored 13% for mathematics.

With this background in mind, Evelyn Pease from the Public Participation in Educa­tion Network, together with the Progressive Principals Association (the Applicants) approached the Western Cape High Court seeking relief in order to ensure delivery of the right to basic education as is enshrined in section 29(1) of the Constitution.

Read More »