CASE DISCUSSION: THE RIGHT TO EMERGENCY HEALTHCARE – OPPELT V HEAD: HEALTH, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, PROVINCIAL ADMINISTRATION: WESTERN CAPE
A recent ruling of the Constitutional Court (the Court) in the Oppelt v Head: Health, Department of Health, Provincial Administration: Western Cape saw a decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) set aside. The Court found that the Department of Health (the Department) was indeed liable to pay damages to Mr Oppelt (the Applicant) after a sporting accident which resulted in the Applicant being left quadriplegic.
The case concerns a delictual claim which arose as a result of delayed medical treatment after the Applicant sustained an injury to his spinal cord during a rugby match that left him paralysed.
The recent judgment by the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in De Villiers v S to set aside the decision of the High Court and reduce the sentence of Mrs De Villiers is a victory for children’s rights and echoes precedent that dictates that where a child will be affected by the incarceration of a parent/ caregiver, heavy consideration must be afforded to the best interests of that child. Considering the importance of children’s rights, it is necessary to reflect on the thinking of the Court in handing down this decision.
The recent ruling of the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) and Others v The Democratic Alliance and Others, which upheld the decision of the Western Cape High Court and dismissed the SABC’s appeal on behalf of its Chief Operating Officer (COO) Hlaudi Motsoeneng and the Minister of Communications, is a welcome one. This is because it serves to cement the authority of the office of the Public Protector, as well as those of other Chapter 9 institutions.
The Centre for Constitutional Rights (the CFCR) welcomes a unanimous judgment by the Constitutional Court in which the Court set aside the results of a number of by-elections in Tlokwe Local Municipality and ordered fresh by-elections – because the elections were not free and fair.
Introduction
2015 marks the 24th year of the ‘16 Days of Activism against Violence against Women’ campaign. By now, it is common knowledge that this is an initiative of the United Nations to acknowledge, address and eliminate all forms of violence against women. Each year, for 16 days, governments, organisations and people from all walks of life run campaigns and programmes aimed at creating awareness about gender-based violence, all wearing the colour orange which has become synonymous with the movement.
[Speech delivered by Phephelaphi Dube: Legal Officer, Centre for Constitutional Rights, to the Water Catchment Areas CEO Forum, Cape Town, 23 November 2015]
THE CONSTITUTION AND GOOD PUBLIC LEADERSHIP: BREAKFAST DISCUSSION SERIES 2015
20 November marks the day on which the United Nations General Assembly adopted the