CONSTITUTIONAL COMMENTARY AND EVENTS

ARTICLES AND STATEMENTS

PODCASTS

SUBMISSIONS

SPEECHES

EVENTS

Vincent Quaglia (2018)

Bachelor of Arts: Political Science and History, University of Miami, United States (2014-2018) “My interest in the South African political landscape first emerged after reading

Read More »

ARTICLE: EXPROPRIATION WITHOUT COMPENSATION

dws2016

What is ‘expropriation without compensation’ (EWC), where does it come from – and what are its implications? 

 To start with, EWC makes no sense. 

  • Property rights are an indispensable requirement for all successful economies and for all genuine democracies.
  • Despite the ANC’s qualifications of EWC, any dilution of property rights would inevitably have a negative impact on agricultural stability, food security, investment and economic growth.
  • EWC is unnecessary.  Section 25 of the Constitution already makes adequate provision for land reform.  The failure of 90% of the government’s land reform initiatives is, according to the recent Report of the High Level Panel, due to the incapacity of government departments and the corruption of state officials. What reason is there to suppose that land redistribution arising from EWC would fare any better?
  • EWC would cause a financial crisis for banks and the Land Bank, which are owed R170 billion by the agricultural sector.
  • Expropriation is not necessary.  Millions of hectares of government-owned land are available for redistribution and 20 000 farms are up for sale. 
  • The average age of commercial farmers is over 60.  Thousands of farmers are leaving the land because of farm murders, recurrent droughts and uncertainty caused by land reform.  Some of our best young farmers are emigrating to countries where their skills are eagerly sought.  The ANC’s real challenge may in future be to keep farmers – of whatever race – with proven food-producing abilities on the land.  
  • There are other promising approaches to land reform. Organisedagriculture has repeatedly – but without any effective response – made practical proposals for the development of a prosperous black agricultural sector – and land reform schemes in the Western Cape have met with considerable success. 
  • The ANC’s approach to land reform would actually undermine black property rights.  It would not result in greater black land ownership – but in most cases state custodianship. EWC would also undermine the property rights of the 7.5 million black households that own their homes.  The value of these homes (R1.5 trillion plus) is at least five times the total value of all the agricultural land in South Africa. 
Read More »

CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES