CONSTITUTIONAL COMMENTARY AND EVENTS
ARTICLES AND STATEMENTS
STATEMENT BY THE FW DE KLERK FOUNDATION ON THE CURRENT LANGUAGE DEBATE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
The Foundation issued the following statement in response to a request by “Die Burger” for comment on the current language debate at the University of Stellenbosch
The Council of the University of Stellenbosch has the responsibility of determining the university’s language policy.
In the Foundation’s view, the Council should, in doing so, bear in mind the requirement in section 29(2) of the Constitution in terms of which “everyone has a right to receive education in the official language or languages of their choice in public educational institutions where that education is reasonable practicable.”
Clearly it is practicable to do so at a university that has traditionally offered tuition in Afrikaans in a province in which Afrikaans is the principal language.
STATEMENT: LANGUAGE POLICY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH
The Foundation has taken note, with shock and disappointment, of the letter and annexure of Prof Wim De Villiers to the Senate of the University of Stellenbosch. The letter makes it clear that if the Rector’s proposals are approved by the University Council on 30 November, Afrikaans will no longer have an equal position with English at US. So after having been assured only a few years ago that Afrikaans would be the default language, and after assurances only last year that the language would enjoy equal status with English, it now appears that Afrikaans is, for all practical purposes on its way out as a language of tuition. Under these circumstances, we must ask what confidence we can place on any assurances by the university administration?
STATEMENT OF THE XV WORLD SUMMIT OF NOBEL PEACE LAUREATES, BARCELONA
We, the Nobel Peace Laureates and Peace Organisations, in the presence of youth from all over the world, gathered together in Barcelona from 12 – 15 November 2015, have considered issues affecting world peace – with special emphasis on the current refugee and migration crisis.
We are profoundly shocked and outraged by the barbaric killing of more than 150 innocent people in Paris on the evening of 13 November. We express our deepest sympathy and solidarity with the families of the victims and with the people of France.
PODCASTS
SUBMISSIONS
SPEECHES
EVENTS
ARTICLE: SECTION 25: TO AMEND OR NOT…

The report of the Presidential Advisory Panel on Land Reform and Agriculture was presented to President Ramaphosa on 4 May 2019 and made available to the public in July. Even before this date, two panelists – Dan Kriek (president of AgriSA) and Nick Serfontein (well-known farmer) – decided to hand over a minority report to the President. It was made available to the public after the main report.
What are the key differences between the main report and the minority report? Why did these two respected panelists find it necessary to draft a minority report? The differences can be summarised in three groups: process issues, style and ideological issues and substantive issues.
ARTICLE: CAN MOTHER TONGUE EDUCATION IN SOUTH AFRICAN SCHOOLS BECOME A REALITY?

During her recent budget speech, the Minister of Basic Education, Angie Motshekga, referred to President Ramaphosa’s target in his State of the Nation address that every learner should be able to read with comprehension by the age of ten. She notes that the language issue is a key factor affecting reading ability and literacy, and then refers to the importance of African languages as teaching and reading languages. However, the phrase “mother tongue education” was not mentioned in her speech.
ARTICLE: PRETORIA HIGH COURT CONFIRMS THE PRESIDENT ACTED RATIONALLY AND REASONABLY IN PRESIDENT V THE PUBLIC PROTECTOR AND ANOTHER

On Thursday, 8 August 2019, the embattled Public Protector (PP) received yet another legal blow when the Pretoria High Court (the High Court) granted the President’s declaratory order confirming that he had complied with the Public Protector’s remedial action against Minister Gordhan.
This remedial action relates to the PP’s investigative report on the approval of former deputy SARS Commissioner, Mr Ivan Pillay’s early retirement pay-out (PP’s report on Pillay-pay-out).
CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES
- Equality
- Non-racialism
- Gender Rights
- The Constitution
- The Rule of Law
- Multiparty Democracy
- Personal Rights
- Cultural, Religious and Language Rights
- Freedom of Expression and Political Rights
- Social and Economic Rights
- Property Rights
- Education
- Access To The Courts, Information And Fair Adminstration