View Archived Content

ARTICLE: TRANSPARENCY, ACCOUNTABILITY AND OPENNESS IN THE APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONERS TO THE COMMISSION FOR GENDER EQUALITY

CGE optIt is vital that all citizens participate in the election of their representatives to guarantee government by the people under the Constitution – not only in Parliament but also in crucial institutions, such as the Commission for Gender Equality (CGE). The CGE is currently in the process of filling several vacancies and in the interests of public participation and representative democracy, the Centre for Constitutional Rights (the CFCR) will provide the public with more information about the CGE, the selection process and the prospective candidates.

Public participation in the appointment process of CGE candidates gives effect to the notion of representative democracy, a cornerstone of the Constitution, which ensures that members of the public are given the opportunity to take part in decisions that affect them. This further gives substance to the principle of accountability. In the Constitutional Court case of Doctors for Life International v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others the Court emphasised that “participation by the public on a continuous basis provides vitality to the functioning of a representative democracy…It encourages citizens of a country to be actively involved in public affairs, identify themselves with the institutions of government and become familiar with the laws that are made.” 

Read More »

INVITATION: HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT CARD 2017 LAUNCH

170317 CFCR HRRC Invite optJoin us for the inaugural launch of the Centre for Constitutional Rights’ (CFCR) flagship publication, the Human Rights Report Card. The launch event is hosted in collaboration with the Commission for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities (CRL Rights Commission) and supported by the Konrad Adenauer Foundation (KAS).

Read More »

CASE DISCUSSION: A NATION SHOULD NOT BE JUDGED BY HOW IT TREATS ITS HIGHEST CITIZENS, BUT ITS LOWEST ONES – SONKE GENDER JUSTICE V THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA AND THE HEAD OF POLLSMOOR CENTRE REMAND DETENTION FACILITY

prisonThe South African Government’s failure to address the overcrowding at Pollsmoor Remand Detention Facility (Pollsmoor RDF) was addressed, on 5 December 2016, by the Western Cape High Court in the matter of Sonke Gender Justice v The Government of the Republic of South Africa and the Head of Pollsmoor Centre Remand Detention Facility.

The Court declared that the Government failed to provide the constitutional and legislative standard of core services, including nutrition, accommodation, exercise, ablution facilities and health care services (hereinafter referred to as core services) to awaiting-trial inmates. This Court Order signals a great victory for the constitutional right to human dignity of awaiting-trial detainees.

The Court Order requires Government to show by 21 December 2016 why the Court should not order it to reduce overcrowding at Pollsmoor RDF to 120% of its approved accommodation, which is currently at a level of 250%. Furthermore, Government must develop a comprehensive plan by 31 January 2017, with specific timeframes for its implementation, pertaining to the deficiencies of core services to the inmates of Pollsmoor RDF. The Court Order also makes it mandatory for the Head of the Pollsmoor RDF (the Second Respondent) to report on his weekly findings on inspections of cell accommodation. This strict timeframe has to be adhered to otherwise the Government may be found to be in contempt of court.

Read More »

ARTICLE: FINALLY, A NEW INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE IS NOMINATED

OIGI optParliament’s Joint Standing Committee on Intelligence (JSCI) has finally nominated a candidate for the post of Inspector-General of Intelligence (IGI) after the post had been vacant since 31 March 2015. Dr S.I. Dintwe has been nominated as the preferred candidate by the JSCI, and the National Assembly (NA) will vote on the nomination this week. The election process has not been without setbacks but public participation and civil action ensured a more open and transparent process this time around, which appears to be the pattern for ensuring accountability in 2016. Despite serious attacks on our constitutional democracy this year, the founding values of “accountability, responsiveness and openness” are alive and well and being upheld by ordinary South Africans through action by civil society – a proud moment for the Constitution.

Read More »

ARTICLE: 16 DAYS OF ACTIVISM AGAINST GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE – THE ROLE OF SAPS

ORANGE 2016 optThe period from 25 November (International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women), to 10 December (International Human Rights Day), marks the annual commemoration of the 16 Days of Activism against Gender-Based Violence campaign. The international campaign originated from the first Women’s Global Leadership Institute coordinated by the Center for Women’s Global Leadership in 1991. Annually, United Nations Women spearhead this cause and this year’s theme is centered around resources that are needed to facilitate the cessation of gender-based violence across the world.

Read More »

ARTICLE: DID THE STATE OF CAPTURE REPORT USURP THE PRESIDENT’S POWERS?

madonsela foterA question has arisen as to whether the Public Protector may legally compel the President to establish a commission of inquiry, seeing as the establishment of commissions of inquiry is, in terms of the Constitution, the sole prerogative of the President.

Various legal authorities have already expressed the opinion that the Public Protector had breached the separation of powers by instructing the President to appoint, within 30 days, a commission of inquiry headed by a judge solely selected by the Chief Justice, who shall provide one name to the President. Should a court come to this conclusion too – then it renders this aspect of the State of Capture Report null and void. The separation of powers doctrine is a vital component of South Africa’s constitutional democracy. The doctrine means that the Constitution demands that courts ensure that all the branches of government act within the confines of the law. Nonetheless, courts must also defer to the exclusive domain of the Executive and Legislative branches of government unless the Constitution so permits the intrusion.

Read More »

ARTICLE: MENTAL ILLNESS SHOULD NOT BE A DEATH SENTENCE

HOSPITAL optOn 21 September, the death of the 37th psychiatric patient removed and transferred from Life Esidimeni Healthcare Centre was announced. The Gauteng Department of Health (the Department) transferred approximately 1 300 patients from Life Esidimeni to 122 non-governmental organisations and other homecare facilities around the province in March 2016. This initiative came after the provincial health department ended its long-term relationship with Life Esidimeni. The Department stated that it had decided to re-prioritise funds allocated to Esidimeni, citing R323 million paid to the hospital during the 2014/15 financial year. The Department had held a public-private partnership with Life Esidimeni, the institution which cared for Gauteng’s most serious mentally ill patients, often from more marginalised and underserved populations.

Read More »

ARTICLE: PUBLIC ENTITIES AND ACCOUNTABILITY: THE SOUTH AFRICAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION

outside parliament sabcOn Wednesday 5 October, the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Communications (the Committee) convened a meeting with the beleaguered Board of the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) to allow the latter to brief the former on the state of affairs at the public broadcaster. This was done in light of the recent Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) judgment concerning its newly appointed Group Executive for Corporate Affairs, Hlaudi Motsoeneng, and the problems that have recently plagued the SABC. It is worth noting that this meeting was conducted during a period of Parliamentary recess, which indicated the gravity of the matter.

Read More »

ARTICLE: WHERE TO FROM HERE FOR THE NATIONAL PROSECUTING AUTHORITY ON JIBA AND MRWEBI?

npaIt is a convoluted affair and – where sense can be made of it – suggests an organisation mired in skulduggery and maladministration. That since its inception the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) is yet to have a head successfully complete a full term without either resigning or being forced to leave the position, is one of the telling signs.

The latest blight to the prosecuting body is the recent decision by the North Gauteng High Court (the Court) in which the General Council of the Bar sought, successfully, to have Nomgcobo Jiba (Jiba) and Lawrence Mrwebi (Mrwebi) struck off the Roll of Advocates. In the judgment, the Court made damning findings against the two. It is of great concern that the following was said of individuals at the helm of the nation’s crime fighting organisation: “I cannot believe that two officers of the court (advocates) who hold such high positions in the prosecuting authority will stoop so low for the protection and defence of one individual who had been implicated in the serious offences.

Read More »