The fact that the Minister’s largest stakeholder, the mining sector, has given notice that they will take the Charter on legal review is a bad sign. At best, it indicates that the Minister could not reach consensus with his largest stakeholder (whose profits must drive the process) and at worst, that something has gone seriously wrong in the relationship between the Minister and the Chamber of Mines. The fact that a number of black South Africans involved in the industry have voiced grave concerns about the Charter, aggravates this concern.
The Charter represents a package of radical measures, for example that middle management – where the real production work in mines is done – should be 80% black; as well as companies involved in the procurement of goods (70% BBE Entity) and services (80% BBE Entity). To implement this with a failing education system and a lack of skills, in a time when the economy needs investment to grow, and when unrest and unemployment and a lack of investor confidence beleaguer the sector, amounts to madness. It leaves one with the impression that the drafters (read government and specifically the Department and the Minister) have no idea how investors think, how investment works and how sustainable jobs are created. This Charter could not have come at a worse time for the mining sector.
Transforming the mining sector and creating investment incentives are not mutually exclusive, but the Charter fails this balance and is likely to scupper any potential investors in the sector. As one black female owner of a mining company pointed out, it will scare all investors, not just those who are invested in the previously white-owned mines. Investors are not opposed to transformation and decent jobs as such, if the goals and targets didn’t keep shifting. This is, unfortunately, happening more often than not.
The Foundation is of the opinion that more and serious discussions should be held between the Government, the Chamber of Mines, the ANC and other relevant stakeholders to address the issues mentioned above. If this is an example of Radical Economic Transformation, then we as a country are on a slippery slope – especially if other sectors are expected to follow suit.
Issued by the FW de Klerk Foundation